Anurag
That is a valid question. Why Neural Networks?
Neural Network is a fascinating technology, 50 years old, but still not fully employed. And the question is why? Why didn't Neural Network progress as fast as many other technologies?
Let us first take a look back …
The concept of neural networks has been around since the early 1950s, but was mostly dormant until the mid 1980s. One of the first neural networks developed was the perceptron created by a psychologist named Frank Rosenblatt in 1958. The perceptron was a very simple system used to analyze data and visual patterns, which generated a great deal of interest in AI community.
Neural Network is a fascinating technology, 50 years old, but still not fully employed. And the question is why? Why didn't Neural Network progress as fast as many other technologies?
Let us first take a look back …
The concept of neural networks has been around since the early 1950s, but was mostly dormant until the mid 1980s. One of the first neural networks developed was the perceptron created by a psychologist named Frank Rosenblatt in 1958. The perceptron was a very simple system used to analyze data and visual patterns, which generated a great deal of interest in AI community.
Unfortunately,
these earlier successes caused people to exaggerate the potential of neural
networks, particularly in light of the limitation in the electronics then
available.
Rosenblatt and other scientists claimed that eventually, with enough complexity and speed, the perceptron would be able to solve almost any problem.
Rosenblatt and other scientists claimed that eventually, with enough complexity and speed, the perceptron would be able to solve almost any problem.
In
1969, Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert of MIT published an influential book,
which showed that the perceptron could never solve a class of problems, and
hinted at several other fundamental flaws in the model.
Their
analysis combined with unfulfilled, outrageous claims convinced the AI community;
and the bodies that fund it; of the fruitlessness of pursuing work with neural
networks, and the majority of researchers turned away from the approach.
The
result was to halt much of the funding and scientists working on neural network
type devices found it almost impossible to receive funding.
This
period of stunted growth lasted through eighties where several events caused a
renewed interest. In 1982 John Hopfield of Caltech presented a paper to the
national Academy of Sciences. With clarity and mathematical analysis, he showed
how such networks could work and what they could do.
By
1985 the American Institute of Physics began what has become an annual meeting
of Neural Networks for Computing. By 1987, the Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineer's (IEEE) first International Conference on Neural Networks
drew more than 1,800 attendees.
And
the 1990 US Department of Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program
named 16 topics, which specifically targeted neural networks.
By
then, the wheel turned again and growth started, but not with the pace that one
would wish to see. Over shadowed by Internet explosion, processing limitations
also contributed to the slow growth.
In
meantime Internet hype has settled down and processing power is no showstopper
anymore. Computerization of business and personal transactions generate the
flood of data that would certainly contribute to machine learning and other
modern data analysis methods.
Thanks
to the availability of cheap microprocessors and recent discoveries about DNA
and human brain, artificial intelligence has gone from being a fantasy to
becoming a reality. In fact, most AI researchers believe that it's only a
matter of 20 to 30 years before machines become at least as intelligent as
humans.
Already
over 80% of Fortune 500 have Neural Net R&D programs and others are
realizing its importance.
Now
... Neural Network is back and this time ... to stay ...
Yet, its future, indeed the very key to the whole technology, lies in commercial use.
Yet, its future, indeed the very key to the whole technology, lies in commercial use.
Comments
Post a Comment