Skip to main content

Cybersecurity Challenges

  1. USB encryption
Almost half the respondents were lacking when it came to USB encryption. They failed to ensure that data from a device connecting to end points via USB was sufficiently encrypted, were it to end up in an unsecured or hostile environment.
  1. Third party device connectivity
Some 35% of organizations aren’t controlling end point connectivity solutions like SD cards, Bluetooth, and Fire Wire, to limit the threats they potentially bring.
  1. USB control
USB devices can be a significant vector for the distribution of cyber attacks. However, over 35% of respondents don’t control or limit any device connecting to end points via USB.
  1. Data loss prevention
Some 37% of companies have no assurance against loss of information, documents, and IP.
  1. Reverse engineering of malware
Only 39% of organizations are actively working on reverse engineering of malware, while 32% are still in an initial phase of developing this.
  1. Emergency response team
Only 16% of assessments showed a fully capable emergency response team, while 51% of companies would be able to put together an emergency response team and are somewhat prepared to respond to a potential breach. However, 32% of organizations would fall short in responding, cleaning up, and analyzing a cyber attack.
  1. Breach indicators
Reporting systems, log managers, security information, and event management (SIEM) systems automatically raise the alarm when indicators reach a point which is deemed unacceptable, reducing the potential impact to the network. Only 38% of organizations are actively monitoring their breach indicators, while 41% have only average capabilities of monitoring and interpreting these. Less than 20% are unable to clearly identify breach indicators as they occur.
  1. Disk encryption
Full disk encryption protects against data theft and loss, especially in the case of a machine or device being removed from a secure environment. The responses show that less than 30% of organizations are enforcing disk encryption.
  1. Application control
Less than half the respondents said their organizations are running an active application control programme, with 25% not actively controlling or limiting the applications within their network. Some 27% are enforcing some application control policies.
  1. Mobile device management (MDM)
Although 26% of companies haven’t yet started to address the fact that mobile devices need to be protected to the same level as laptops or desktops, over half the organizations are actively running MDMt, while 22% have already started to enforce some MDM policies within their organizations.
These results show that an encouraging proportion of companies are actively deploying protection, but most don’t feel fully prepared and are focused on further optimization. None felt completely unprepared but all acknowledged a greater need for enhanced security.

Anurag

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

JAVA Scrollbar, MenuItem and Menu, PopupMenu

ava AWT Scrollbar The  object  of Scrollbar class is used to add horizontal and vertical scrollbar. Scrollbar is a  GUI  component allows us to see invisible number of rows and columns. AWT Scrollbar class declaration public   class  Scrollbar  extends  Component  implements  Adjustable, Accessible   Java AWT Scrollbar Example import  java.awt.*;   class  ScrollbarExample{   ScrollbarExample(){               Frame f=  new  Frame( "Scrollbar Example" );               Scrollbar s= new  Scrollbar();               s.setBounds( 100 , 100 ,  50 , 100 );               f.add(s);               f.setSize( 400 , 400 );               f.setLayout( null );               f.setVisible( true );   }   public   static   void  main(String args[]){           new  ScrollbarExample();   }   }   Output: Java AWT Scrollbar Example with AdjustmentListener import  java.awt.*;   import  java.awt.event.*;   class  ScrollbarExample{        ScrollbarExample(){               Frame f=  new  Frame( "Scro

Difference between net platform and dot net framework...

Difference between net platform and dot net framework... .net platform supports programming languages that are .net compatible. It is the platform using which we can build and develop the applications. .net framework is the engine inside the .net platform which actually compiles and produces the executable code. .net framework contains CLR(Common Language Runtime) and FCL(Framework Class Library) using which it produces the platform independent codes. What is the .NET Framework? The Microsoft .NET Framework is a platform for building, deploying, and running Web Services and applications. It provides a highly productive, standards-based, multi-language environment for integrating existing investments with next-generation applications and services as well as the agility to solve the challenges of deployment and operation of Internet-scale applications. The .NET Framework consists of three main parts: the common language runtime, a hierarchical set of unified class librari

C++ this Pointer, static, struct and Enumeration

C++ this Pointer In C++ programming,  this  is a keyword that refers to the current instance of the class. There can be 3 main usage of this keyword in C++. It can be used  to pass current object as a parameter to another method. It can be used  to refer current class instance variable. It can be used  to declare indexers. C++ this Pointer Example Let's see the example of this keyword in C++ that refers to the fields of current class. #include <iostream>    using   namespace  std;   class  Employee {       public :           int  id;  //data member (also instance variable)               string name;  //data member(also instance variable)            float  salary;          Employee( int  id, string name,  float  salary)             {                   this ->id = id;                  this ->name = name;                  this ->salary = salary;            }             void  display()             {                 cout<<id<< "  " <<name<&